Category: Community

The connections between us all

Community

International ME/CFS Awareness Day

Today is (was?) International ME/CFS Awareness Day, and the Sock It 2 ME/CFS project is officially launched. Hoping to do for ME/CFS sufferers, research budgets and families what the AIDS quilt did for HIV, the “sock project” has the potential to open a lot of eyes.

Some quick info from the site:

What is Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome?

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, as it’s known in the US, is a debilitating disease which has been classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an organic, infectious neuro-immune disorder since 1969. It can occur in both epidemic and sporadic forms; over 60 outbreaks of ME/CFS have been recorded worldwide since 1934.

ME/CFS …

  • causes more functional impairment than diabetes, heart failure or kidney disease.
  • creates a level of disability comparable to MS, chemotherapy or the final stages of AIDS.
  • strikes an estimated 17 to 20 million worldwide, impairing function and shortening lives.
  • like AIDS in the early days, gets inadequate funding due to widespread misunderstanding.
  • has only recently gained notice in blood banks internationally as an infectious disease concern.
  • Community

    World Day Against Software Patents – 24 September

    Whether you think that software patents are a BAD THINGTM (as do I) or you think they are a good idea, it is important to know what it happening around this issue. Today is World Day Against Software Patents. Organized by the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure the day is meant to draw attention world-wide to the issue of software patents and encourage active participation in the fight to stop the practice. There are links to articles, a draft of their petition to stop software patents worldwide which you can sign and/or comment on, and way more information than you are likely to be able to get through today. Check it out.

    Community

    Repurposing Social Software

    Social software has had an enormous impact on the workplace, but how much bigger can we go? Already chat is a major communication tool (usually within a business, but sometimes with customers as well.) Businesses are finding justification for setting up blogs and wikis both internally and externally. I work at a company where a large portion of the developers work remotely (there is a joke internally that the hiring manager is trying to get a developer in every state) and keeping in touch is done through a combination of chat, wiki, GoogleDocs and phone conferences. The issue we are discovering with phone conferences is one of bandwidth. While the old style of everyone in the office sitting around a conference phone while everyone remote dials in isn’t a major strain on the VoIP server, many of our conferences lately have involved everyone who is taking part in the conference dialing in via soft-phone from their workstation. The load on the poor server! So the idea was brought up – why not set up an account on a hosted Ventrilo server. That way our VoIP server stays available for our customers (as it should).

    This got me thinking – what other social software might be re-purposed for business use? The one that immediately sprang to mind was Twitter. A business could set up a twitter server with a few little modifications which could make it extremely handy. First, set up the server to log all the tweets. Next, set it up so that when logging the tweet it checks the message. If the message starts with @log it could do some magic with it and then either silently discard it (not passing it on to the network), pass it on without changing it, or pass on a customized message based on that tweet.

    As a for instance, here are some @log actions I thought up this afternoon. (Most of these require that the twitter server also has access to things like the primary db server, etc):

    • @login <message> – the server puts a clock in message in the time clock table of the database for the user sending the tweet, and puts the optional message in the ‘notes’ column of the table (if there is one). The server then sends the message username has clocked in
    • @logout <message> – same as for login, but clocks the user out.
    • @log [task_message] – the server puts the userid, message and time in the tasks table and sends the tweet username is working on [task message]
    • @logend <message> – same as above, but puts an end time in the row and sends the tweet username is no longer working on [task_message] <message>

    Ok, so it’s not a lot, but it is simple, and simple things are more easily adopted. And this ties into electronic time cards, and electronic task time tracking. Hmmm. So what others are there that could be adapted? how about adding a “social tagging” site (something like Spock) to enhance your intranet and internal wiki? You could easily see who is tagged with which project or team and quickly find the right person to answer your question.

    I’m sure there are plenty more things that could be incorporated. I just haven’t thought of them yet.

    Technorati Tags: , ,

    Community

    Live on (yet) another social site

    Yes, it’s true, I finally broke down and signed up on MySpace. Truth be told, I have had a rather private account on there for a while now, but never set up anything in the profile – mainly to allow me to visit band sites of some of my favorite Nerdcore artists. Since my wife has been using it for a while, as well as several friends from Washington state I thought I’d go ahead and dive in as well. So you can find me there too, at www.myspace.com/evardsson.

    I also set up a site for 2DL at www.myspace.com/2dlmusic (the 2dl url was taken)

    Now I guess, I should think about doing something with my Facebook account. Ok – never mind, I did it, it’s here.

    So, how does one keep up with all of these? Well, for one, I found a nifty thing to update my MySpace blog when I update this blog. Now if I can get the Feed Invasion app to work on Facebook it will show up there as well. Haven’t I done enough damage for one day?

    Community

    Shape of the Future?

    Is the end of our notions of privacy the shape of the future? While most ‘What does the future hold’ articles seem to be full of overly wishful thinking and fluff, this is an interesting and thought-provoking article from SF author Charlie Stross. This is a talk he presented in Munich at a TNG Technology Consulting technology open day. (transcript: Charlie’s Diary: Shaping the future) He brings up some interesting possibilities – from an always-on, completely connected populace, to complete “lifelogs” housed in synthetic diamond storage devices.

    Community

    Spoke too soon? Formal Objections filed in W3C vote

    While the vote totals in the poll are still positive by a large majority, there have been a couple formal objections lodged which could overturn the vote. The W3C‘s process for consensus and dissent allows for formal objections to either be remedied by compromise, or in a case where that compromise is not possible a Chair may record a decision in spite of dissent in order for a group to move on. According to the same process document:

    Groups should favor proposals that create the weakest objections. This is preferred over proposals that are supported by a large majority but that cause strong objections from a few people. As part of making a decision where there is dissent, the Chair is expected to be aware of which participants work for the same (or related) Member organizations and weigh their input accordingly.

    While there doesn’t seem to be much interest outside the W3C and WHATWG on this issue right now (at least none that I am seeing online) I will be keeping a close eye on the developments and announcements from W3C to see how this all plays out.

    Technorati Tags: ,

    Community

    Looks like WHATWG’s HTML 5 is a go

    Although the poll hasn’t closed yet (it is open until May 4) 90 96 of the 115 voting members of the HTML Working Group have cast their vote, and the results are:

    Shall we Adopt HTML5 as our specification text for review?

    Yes: 78 84
    No: 2
    Concur: 7
    Abstain: 3

    So, even if the remaining 25 19 votes are all no, the vote is to adopt the WHATWG HTML5 (comprised of the Web Apps 1.0 and Web Forms 2.0 specifications) as a starting point for the next HTML version.

    Other votes on the page include the decision to name the next HTML specification “HTML 5” and to appoint Ian Hickson and Dave Hyatt as the specification editors. I highly recommend reading the results, in order to see the rationale given by many of the members for their vote on each of the questions, as this gives a valuable insight into where the group currently is and in what direction they are looking to move.

    Technorati Tags: , ,

    Edits: updated numbers on 5/3

    Community

    WHATWG Pitches HTML5 to W3C

    The Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (WHATWG) has sent a Proposal to Adopt HTML5 to the HTML Working Group of the WorldWide Web Consortium (W3C).

    HTML5, currently in working draft status is comprised of the Web Apps 1.0 and Web Forms 2.0 specifications. While the W3C XHTML2 Working Group has just been chartered in March 2007, with a goal date for completion of December 2009, the work of WHATWG on the HTML5 recommendation has been ongoing since 2004 and has support from Apple, Opera and Mozilla. In explaining the relationship between XHTML2 and HTML5 the Web Apps 1.0 draft has this to say:

    1.3.4. Relationship to XHTML2

    This section is non-normative.

    XHTML2 [XHTML2] defines a new HTML vocabulary with better features for hyperlinks, multimedia content, annotating document edits, rich metadata, declarative interactive forms, and describing the semantics of human literary works such as poems and scientific papers.

    However, it lacks elements to express the semantics of many of the non-document types of content often seen on the Web. For instance, forum sites, auction sites, search engines, online shops, and the like, do not fit the document metaphor well, and are not covered by XHTML2.

    This specification aims to extend HTML so that it is also suitable in these contexts.

    XHTML2 and this specification use different namespaces and therefore can both be implemented in the same XML processor.

    It will be interesting to see if the WHATWG proposal is taken as the HTML Working Group, like the XHTML2 Working Group, was only chartered in March of 2007, and as such, failure to adopt the proposed HTML5 draft would mean the need to reinvent the wheel.

    Technorati Tags: , , ,

    Community

    Petition for Linux Users

    Bryan Peters at showusthecode.com has put out a petition for users of Linux to add their voice to the Open Letter to Steve Ballmer to show the code where Linux infringes on Microsoft’s intellectual property. It would seem to be the only strategy left to MS at this point, is to prove that there is some basis for their threats of lawsuit against distributors of Linux for IP infringement, or to apologize tactfully and say “We made a mistake.”

    Technorati Tags: